Bigger Isn’t Always Better

Whenever I talk to aspiring fiction writers who are just starting out, I always recommend that they begin by writing short stories.  There are several reasons for this.

Short stories allow a writer to experiment within a small package.  First person, or third? Past tense, or present? Ratio of dialog to narrative to description. High fantasy or science fiction or urban fantasy or romance or mystery?  Character or plot driven? Vignette or full story arc?  Short stories let you test yourself, practice, and improve in a shorter period of time. You can write a short story in a week, a day if you’re a fast writer. It takes most of us at least a few months to write a novel. During the same time you could try out a dozen ideas in short stories.

Writing short encourages you to make every word count. To know what the essence of the story is and not to wander.  It’s a great challenge to accept a very tight word limit, say 500 words, and tell a story within it.  When you do “graduate” to writing novels, you won’t be as profligate with your words.

You can hold the whole story in your mind.  With a novel you have plots and subplots, secondary characters and red herrings.  When you’re just beginning that’s a lot to juggle.  Make it easy on yourself. Start small.  Learn to juggle just a couple of balls before you try to keep half a dozen flaming torches in the air.

It’s easier to get good feedback on short stories.  You’re critique partners don’t have to wonder if you’re wandering off on a tangent or setting up something for later in the book as they might with a novel fragment — it’s all there.  They can tell you if you pulled it all together or if the story fell apart in act three.  And once you’ve got that feedback, it’s quicker to revise a short story.

You can learn most of this from writing novel chunks, but using the short story format encourages you to complete a whole thing, with a beginning, middle, and an end, not just a piece.  Storytellers need to know how to start, sustain, and finish their tales. It’s easier to start learning that with a single plot line instead of a sprawling epic.

For a while, the market for short stories was shrinking; only a few print magazines still bought them, and only in a few genres.  Now with people turning more and more to the internet for entertainment, there are an increasing number of markets online for short stories, some of which pay quite well.  You can even sell your stories yourself on Kindle and Smashwords if you’re so inclined.

On this last point, I’d like to digress a little.  There are some authors who suggest that you not spend too much time revising. Give it a light once over, then out the door it goes.  They publish their shorts on Smashwords and Kindle and feel that reader reviews are good teachers.  That’s true as far as it goes, but I can’t agree that this is the best start for beginning writers.

Every piece that goes out the door with your name on it is your ambassador.  It may be the first thing of yours that someone reads — and it could be the last. Every story should be the best you can make it right now,  within a reasonable amount of time. And that understanding comes with experience.  And that experience is something you can get from writing multiple short stories.

Yes, if you foul your name by self-publishing work that’s really not ready, you can always continue your career under a pen name. It’s not a fatal mistake. But I think waiting a bit to publish while you learn your craft will be time well spent.

Start by writing several short stories and see how your work improves.  Then you can decide if you want to go back and fix your first efforts, or trash ’em. Then push whatever survives out the door, and start another story.



Filed under writing

3 responses to “Bigger Isn’t Always Better

  1. Great post! Agree completely. Shorts are a great way to gain experience and test the water. I believe some kind writer suggested this to me years ago when I first met her (ahem). 🙂 Very valuable advice. I find the best thing about writing short is that it’s easier to fit into a crazy work schedule if you have a full time job but don’t want to lose your muse, or your chops.

    I also agree that the level of professionalism is critical. That’s true no matter the length of the piece. Having test readers are very helpful (folks who are not writers and enjoy reading your genre and are willing to give constructive feedback). I think this is very important if you’re going to self-publish or if don’t expect to get a lot of editorial attention from your current publisher. Test readers will give you different feedback than a critique group will. Critique members are writers too, and can provide feedback about how “they” would change certain elements for improvement. That’s not necessarily how you will need to change your story to stay in your own voice and unique style. Test readers will not suggest the “how,” but they will point out problems so you can identify the fix needed. Both groups will provide invaluable feedback to an author. Equally important, I believe, is developing a relationship with a professional editor to get both structural and line edits handled if you want your work to be professional. As the publishing industry continues to do more with less, I believe this will become even more important.

  2. I think the revision process is important to fine-tune, to get the maximum bang for buck (writing time, in this case.) Most of my stories need some revision after completion, for clarity, generally. But, past a certain point (different for every writer), revision is thumb-twiddling. Better to move on, write a new story that works better, than continue polishing a turd (extreme, but an easy way to encourage myself to move on.) Finding your sweet spot allows a new writer to improve their product to the best of their current ability, while not sucking up time better spent improving their craft (best accomplished by writing new stories.)

    Also, I believe the term aspiring writer puts new (newbie, unpublished, beginning, these all work fine) writers in a self-defeating mental box. If you write, you are a writer. Aspiring (wanna-be) as an adjective describes someone who is not. An aspiring writer is someone who wants to , i.e. someone who doesn’t write, and therefore is not a writer.

    Blog post about this terminology:

    • Silver, I liked your post. The term “aspiring writer” probably had more relevance back when tradpub was the only option and people aspired to publication. But you’re right, if you’re writing, you’re a writer. Words do affect us in subtle ways, and we should be careful how we use them. “New” or “beginning” is probably better than aspiring.

      I agree that past a certain point, revision is little more than thumb-twiddling, even if Mythbusters did prove that you can put a shine on sh*t. Writing a new story will usually teach you more than yet another revision — after a certain point. Knowing where that point is, is the trick.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.